日历
网志分类
· 所有网志
· 传播理论
· 新媒体技术
· 研究方法
· 统计分析
· SPSS Syntax
· 论文写作
· 讲习班事务
· 杂项·家庭作业·数据
· 留学问答
· 未分类
站内搜索
友情链接
· 我的歪酷
· 竹家庄blogspot版(2009)
· 竹家庄MSN版(2007-08)
· 自学资源链接
· 家庭作业
你从哪里来
Locations of visitors to this page
你从哪里来之二

订阅 RSS

0215465

歪酷博客

竹家庄


« 上一篇: 我一定要读Ph.D.吗? 下一篇: 理科学生可以读你的博士生吗? »
庄主 @ 2007-01-15 21:21

问(2007-1-15):

When I design my methodology for the research proposal, do I need to consider whether the method is feasible or not for a student? I mean, if the method will cost a lot of money, need technological support, or it is hard to carry out for a student, should I use it?

庄主答(2007-1-15):

Yes, you are right. Feasibility is an important factor to consider when you design a study. Unrealistically expensive and/or complicated designs might be viewed as lack of experience. It is indeed a challenge to come up a design both rigorous and practical. However, every applicant faces this challenge. At the end, those who demonstrate creativity and innovativeness in solving the dilemma win.

I attended a research seminar this afternoon, in which a marketing professor from a U.S. university presented a series of studies on the credibility of word-of-mouth on the Internet. I was very impressed by how little resources she used in setting up the studies to derive a lot of interesting results. One of the studies was simply a secondary analysis of movie reviews published on Yahoo!, which obviously cost her nothing at all. That's the kind of "creativity" and "innovativeness" I was talking about above.





评论 / 个人网页 / 扔小纸条
* 昵称

已经注册过? 请登录

新用户请先注册 以便能显示头像及追踪评论回复

Email
网址
* 评论
表情
 


 

分类小组论坛
杂谈 , 娱乐、八卦 , 文学、艺术 , 体育 , 旅游、同城 , 象牙塔 , 情感 , 时尚、生活 , 星座 , 科技

请注意遵守中华人民共和国法律法规, 如威胁到本站生存, 将依法向有关部门报告, 同时本站的相关记录可能成为对您不利的证据.

相关法律法规
全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定
中华人民共和国计算机信息系统安全保护条例
中华人民共和国计算机信息网络国际联网管理暂行规定
计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法
计算机信息系统国际联网保密管理规定